← Back to Articles

A white “No Photography Allowed” sign with a red circle and slash over a black camera icon is taped to a glass storefront window. The reflection shows a softly blurred city street and the warmly lit interior of the shop.

“No Photography Allowed”

A look at photographers’ rights

2025 Update: When I first wrote this over a decade ago, “No Photography Allowed” signs were popping up everywhere, and I figured the paranoia couldn’t get much worse. I was wrong. Today, we’ve got drones in the sky, facial recognition on every corner, and social media making every photo feel like public property. The laws haven’t changed much, but the technology sure has. The same confusion still reigns: who can stop you from taking a photo, who can tell you to delete it, and when should you stand your ground versus just walking away? If you care about photography, or your civil liberties, I think it’s worth knowing the answers.


This is off the topic of camera simulations, but it’s something I feel everyone with a camera should think about: your rights as a photographer.

Battle at the Alamo

I recently visited the Alamo in San Antonio, Texas. When I took a picture inside one of the old buildings, I was immediately reprimanded by a docent who told me that photography was not allowed. I asked what would happen if I chose to ignore that rule, and he said he’d call security and have me forcibly removed from the premises. Sheesh. Take a pill, bro.

A Paranoid Store Owner

A couple months ago, I was walking downtown in Palm Springs, California, where I saw a fellow pedestrian admiring some dishes displayed inside a storefront window. He took out his camera, snapped a photo, and the shop door flew open. “Hey! My dishes are copyrighted, and you can’t take pictures of them!” said the man who I assumed to be the store owner. The flustered pedestrian apologized and quickly put away his camera.

Overzealous Security Guards

A couple years ago, while strolling downtown Indianapolis, Indiana, and taking shots of building exteriors, I was stopped by a security guard who demanded to know who I was, what I was doing, and then informed me that he needed to inspect my photos. Though he didn’t use these words, I very much felt “detained” and “released.”

One more: A few years ago, I was taking photos of some friends as we walked through a shopping mall. Not only was I stopped and questioned by security, they told me I had to delete the photos I had been taking. Not knowing I had a choice, I naively complied.

Utter Madness

Now, let those stories sink in for a second: forcible removals from public places. Harassment from store owners. Detention by security guards. Intimidation to delete one’s data.

And for what? Causing a disturbance? Endangering the public? Damaging property?

Nope. Just taking a photo.

Taking. A. Photo. (No matter how many times I repeat it to myself, I can’t make it make sense.)

So What Does the Law Say?

I’m no legal expert (I repeat, I'm no legal expert), but the research I’ve done on this topic reveals the following:

  • The shop owner who scolded the guy for taking photos of his precious plates was completely out of line. No one, not store owners or even the police, can prevent you from taking photos of whatever you want from a public place. Regarding the store owner’s copyright cry, yes, there are laws against publishing photos of copyrighted works, not taking photos for private use.
  • The security guard who stopped me while I was taking photos of downtown Indianapolis was just doing his job by being paranoid. But he wasn’t a police officer, so I had no legal obligation to give him any information, to let him detain me, or to show my photos to him.
  • The security guard at the mall also had no right to detain me, and certainly no right to make me delete my photos (even the police generally need a court order to do that). Even though a shopping mall is private property, it’s open to the public, so most private property rules go out the window. The photos I took that day were nothing special, but I am still filled with regret for letting a mall cop cross the line like that.
  • I’m not sure about the Alamo situation, and museums in general seem to be a big gray area. Are they private or public property? Do they have a legal right to ban photography? I don’t know, but I’m going to find out.

Photographers’ rights can unfortunately be a murky and contentious issue, and I recognize that common sense and decency play as big a role as any law. Anyone can take photos of kids at a public playground without getting their parents’ permission, for example. Illegal? No. Creepy? Yes, don’t do it!

Educate Yourself

My point here is that you educate yourself on what you can and can’t do with your camera. Not every battle is worth fighting, but how you exercise or forgo your civil liberties should be an informed choice that you make.

Further Reading


2025 Closing Note: More cameras, more rules, same confusion. Whether it’s a drone shot, a selfie, or street photography, the principle hasn’t changed: photography itself isn’t a crime. The moment someone tries to convince you otherwise, you’re seeing fear, not law, in action. Know your rights but also use good judgment to keep photography safe and enjoyable.

← Back to Articles